Murrieta Ban the Red Light Cameras


Ban the Cams in Murrieta

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 Read new updates under Articles.

We found an excellant attorney who is willing to give free consultation for fighting the camera tickets:  Go to Links.

 Vote YES to remove the RED LIGHT TRAFFIC CAMERAS

November 2012 Murrieta Ballot to remove the Red Light Cameras!

Please donate to help us next year to purchase signs, banners etc to remove the Red Light Traffic Cameras. See Donate page.  Thank you!

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you to everyone who gathered signature and passed out flyers for the petition:

Zorina Bennett

Francis Burns

Chris Beiber

Clayton Thibodeau

Kathy Hydrusko

Patrice Lynes

Bridgitte Green

O.B. Johnson

Kent Appel

Bob Kowell

Robert

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

MURRIETA: Red-light camera petition validated

Enough signatures on petitions seeking to ask voters to decide whether red light cameras should be allowed in Murrieta have been validated to move the issue forward, Murrieta City Clerk Kay Vinson said.

City Council members will review the validated petition during the Nov. 1 council meeting, which is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at City Hall, 24601 Jefferson Ave.



Read more: http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/murrieta/article_87e96385-dc4b-5ac6-8112-54e571570109.html#ixzz1bnoPJrN0

____________________________________________________________________

MURRIETA: Red light camera ban petition submitted

A petition to ban red light cameras in Murrieta was submitted on Tuesday.

Murrieta resident Diana Serafin has spent the past six months collecting signatures in an effort to scrap the city's five-year-old traffic camera program. If the petition is successful, voters will decide in November 2012.

read more http://blogs.pe.com/news/digest/2011/09/murrieta-red-light-camera-ban.html  _______________________________________________________

MURRIETA: Petition to ban red-light cameras submitted 

A resident submitted a petition to the Murrieta city clerk Tuesday with more than 6,350 signatures in support of an election asking voters if they want to ban red-light cameras in the city.

The signatures, gathered by resident Diana Serafin, will be delivered to the Riverside County registrar of voters office.

Serafin's signatures filled nearly 340 pages, and the names were counted twice by a five-member team from the city clerk's office.



Read more: http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/murrieta/article_b2adda04-9fae-5e28-8037-d26881b8d727.html#ixzz1YgywVOkr

 Freedom of Information document from City of Murrieta.  Our taxes at work.  Taxpayers paying twice for the Cameras - Tarp bailout of Goldman Sachs, who bought ATS and the $290,099 for the program. 

 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The City of Murrieta has four Red Light Cameras, three on Murrieta Hot Spring Road and one on Clinton Keith and Nutmeg.  The City Council voted to add 2 more cameras on Murrieta Hot Springs, one at the 215 freeway intersection and one at the 15 freeway entrance.

A ticket can cost a person between $471 . If you attempt to defend yourself in court and lose, it will cost you $768.

Our goal is to stop Taxation by Citation in Murrieta CA.

If a Red Light Camera ticket is issued, one cannot fight it in court.  The courts in Riverside have decided the camera picture is proof you are guilty.

We all know camera videos can be manipulated.  Other concerns is how often is the equipment calibrated, maintained or replaced. 

The taxpayers of Murrieta are paying over $6000 a month rental for each camera.  The taxpayers, then may receive a ticket from the cameras they are paying for.    What a scam!

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Get rid of the cameras. Lengthen the yellows.

Why lengthen yellows? It is a real cheap way to reduce accidents - so it can be done at every dangerous corner in the region, not just at a few corners, as with with the expensive cameras. A well-done academic study says that a 1/2 sec. longer yellow cuts severe crashes by 30%, and a full sec. longer makes a 40% cut. (Source: "Development of Guidelines for Treating Red-Light Running," Texas Transportation Institute, pg 2-20.)

Even though longer yellows reduce crashes, the camera Industry wants to SHORTEN them! If passed, AB 529, by Asm. Gatto (Glendale), will allow cities to reduce many posted speed limits by 5 mph. The lower limits will, in turn, allow them to shorten yellows. The shortening permitted by a 5 mph decrease in the limit will increase the number of tickets by at least 50%. (Four of the sponsoring cities have red light cameras.) Worse, the shortening will increase severe accidents, by 30 to 40%. (Source: The TTI study, pg. 2-20.) (The accident rate increases less than does the number of violations because many accidents occur multiple seconds after the light has gone red - the driver is impaired (medical condition, liquor, drugs), and fails to see the red light, at all.)

AB 529 is moving along, fast, with a vote scheduled soon.

Phone your assemblyperson and your state senator, ASAP. It takes no more than 3 minutes per call. And then phone the AAA and ask them to oppose AB 529.

From Jim 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 Pros and Cons

Pros

• City raises needed revenue
• Cameras can determine who caused accident if it is a streaming video.
• Reduce traffic Police Officers
• More tickets can be issued per hour."A police officer can write about three tickets in an hour,"

 

Cons

• Taxation by Citation – Cities need money!
• Increase accidents - Rear end accidents up 60%
• Does NOT stop accidents
• Fines about $500 plus court costs & traffic school
• Cannot defend yourself  legally in court - Guilty by Picture?
• Denial of Due Process – 6th amendment – cannot confront camera company
• Guilty until proven innocent – pay fine first court second
• Mega Lawsuits against for profit camera companies & cities
• Data Manipulation
• Illegal contracts in California
• Illegal tickets issued

•  No standards/ no calibration – violates state law
•  Snitch tickets no court location
•  Cities & camera companies profiting – out of state
•  Green, Yellow & Red lights shortened
•  Hurts local businesses
•  Blinding Flash (3 seconds blinded)
•  Invasion of privacy - Big Brother watching
•  Creates distrust and animosity for local officials
•  Misidentification – Who’s picture?  Take the 5th  amendment
•  Points on your record
•  Insurance goes up
•  Cannot catch drunk drivers
•  Cannot catch unlicensed drivers
•  Cannot catch unregistered cars
•  Cannot catch uninsured drivers

 Ban the Cams in Murrieta.

 

 

 Murrieta Hot Springs and Whitewood:  The light is yellow and green at the same time.

 

Limited Government Political Action Committee (LGPAC)

FPPC # 1301503

This free website was made using Yola.

No HTML skills required. Build your website in minutes.

Go to www.yola.com and sign up today!

Make a free website with Yola